Zum Inhalt springen

geocaching dt rating

These incidences can also be precipitated by a change to the difficulty or terrain. Geocaching Holiday Geocoin . On the CO side, if it's a mistake, I would think that either having the initial cache info stored when I begin editing, or giving me the option to store the 'new' correct data would be nice and simple. The point of the difficulty/terrain ratings is to communicate the general nature of the geocaching experience to potential seekers, so they can better assess whether they should attempt to find the cache. Best GPS for Geocaching to Buy in 2019 (Top 8 Reviews) The best GPS for geocaching is a device that allows determining the location of a person or an object in different parts of the world. Thanks for reminding me. Page. Geocaching HQ - help desk and customer service portal. Items On sale; Last Chance Items; Account . When you submit a geocache for publication, you must specify ratings for difficulty and terrain using a 5-star scale. Based on this grouping, I think it would be fair to say that they consider a "feature suggestion" to be just as problematic as a "bug". Items On sale; Last Chance Items; Account . Furthermore, let's keep in mind that almost no one will think of this feature until after the rating's been changed, so it will be virtually pointless to give the user the option unless they are allowed to go back and assert their desire for the snapshot long after they've logged the find. Because the point of the difficulty/terrain ratings is not to preserve your precious D/T grid. We had the opposite of most people...a cache we found that was probably only a 1/1.5 when we found it originally has been moved and the Terrain upped to 2.0/4.0. Copyright © 2000-2020 Groundspeak, Inc. DBA Geocaching. More than 642 million "Found it" and "Event Attended" logs have been recorded since the game started in 2000.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. And processing would be a whole lot easier than with your proposed method, too. Allows you to display the geocache list by names or codes. It's an alternative solution that reaps other useful benefits besides helping 'incidental side games' (of which, I'm obviously not a serious contender). Back to topic: Why not simply freeze the D-T-rating and attributes of the cache listing (so the cache owner can't change it) when the first found log is written? Allows you to display the geocache list by names or codes. I like the idea of freezing D/T as well as country and flag on the date of a find. We suggest looking for something with a difficulty/terrain rating of D2T2 or under to start off. From what I've seen this issue arises most when a CO changes a property and someone no longer qualifies or don't like that there's a hole in their stats. If you contribute to this wiki, you agree to provide permission to others under this license. Visit Geocaching.com to see just how many geocaches are nearby and to learn how to start finding them. Bumping this thread to suggest an enhancement to the feature that could snapshot all the cache's data at the time the log is posted, not just D/T. Featured. If we were to restrict features because they allegedly make it easier to cheat (as if you couldn't already), then there should not be a feature to alter a cache's coordinates. Add your rating See all 5 kid reviews. If it holds no water, the thread will either eventually die, or be resurrected slightly when someone else chimes in. The CO corrects the D/T ratings and indicates that they should replace the original values. Of course, at the time I don't believe that there were any caches in the region that is now South Sudan and there may have been only 1 in all of Sudan (prior to the split). my subreddits. Rating: 100%. The career stats are inaccurate. Geocache List. Please try to rate your cache accurately. From the logger standpoint, it doesn't matter so much whether the new stat is changed with the new physical state, or corrected due to an error. Having them as a more accurate historical account would help the user statistics actually be more like what they're intended to display. Are you suggesting that the current implementation makes it harder to cheat at the incidental side games? That's about it the way I see it as a non-GS web app developer. I just don't agree with the new D/T rating, and sure don't feel like we "earned" it. They are only cheating themselves. Select Setup > Geocaches. Select Setup > Geocaches. Whereas I've always come at it from the angle of the log poster; the challenge/stats cacher. Skip to … Page. One is the easiest. Allows you to edit the number of geocaches found. I do find value in this feature, because currently stats only display current cache properties, not necessarily the statistics of your caching career based on your actual previous accomplishments. Added options like choosing which date to pull stats by is a minor thing that only people who'd care to use it would need to see it. No, it wouldn't change anything. The OP would help with this, but I imagine the application for the request is extremely limited and probably not worth the effort. You can post now and register later. Rating: 100%. All we can do i speculate about the advantages or disadvantages for any implementation strategy. There's no cash prize to be won, no trophies to be awarded, so "cheating" would be rather pointless. *shrug* that's the subjective question. If someone wants to cheat by creatimg a dummy account, creating a cache, finding it, changing the D/T and finding again, who cares. The terrain rating covers the physical effort of arriving at the coordinates. This way you can be sure, your D-T-grid does not change so easily. When you submit a geocache for publication, you must specify ratings for difficulty and terrain using a 5-star scale. FWIW, this doesn't have to be implemented in the massive storage cost method most people seem to think it would be (via storing the D/T with logs). Add to Cart. Sure, sometimes ratings are changed to reflect a real change, but often they are changed because they have just always been inaccurate. There are probably even some within walking distance of where you are right now. If GS reads these, then the idea is planted, and the implementers can debate the merits. Powered by Invision Community, at the end of the day this is a "bugs and features discussion" forum, Those that are implementing features at GS often don't participate in discussions, Of course the suggestion being this thread isn't perfect - no feature is. It’s one of the best GPS devices for geocaching if you’re on slightly more of a budget but still after a quality Garmin product. If it changes afterword it's effect on grid completion, challenges, etc. Geocache List. Therefore, every now and then when a cap is added on top of a mountain, my average terrain rating takes a big leap for a week. Even the owner of a challenge who knows someone is cheating should only laugh at someone's ability to cheat themselves. For example: Geocaching Wiki is a FANDOM Games Community. The Geocaching® App also restricts basic members in relation to cache types, as well as DT ratings, and there is no enhanced filtering or searching which the Cachly app still allows for basic members. Find-a-Cache. The finder uses some stats package to process these strings, to produce stats that fit his specific preferences. Happy Holidays Collection; Wonders of the World; Celebrating 20 Years of Geocaching; Challenges and Milestones; Premium Member Collection; Novelty Items Trackables. Minimal additional data storage. Project-GC is a site with the goal to provide statistics and tools for all the geocachers in the world. Even sensible, well-supported, useful features are ignored, like the one for managing ghost trackables. I think a better solution is just to shrug. I do however agree that the ambiguities with St. Martin/Sint Maarten is worth fixing considering the number of geocaches that are actually impacted. And it also would help a great deal to allow to add additional hints to a difficult puzzle cache after a while and decreasing the D-rating accordingly wthout annoying those who. A CO creates a cache and inadvertently switches the intended values but doesn't noticed until a month after it's been published. The best GPS for geocaching provides information about latitude and longitude, and … Thats something I didn't think about. Add to Cart. Special Price $9.10 Regular Price $12.99. A year later a bridge is built over the ravine so the CO changes the T rating to a 2 but want's to keep the 3.5 rating as it indicates the actual terrain rating prior to the bridge being built. GEOCACHING is a hybrid of GEO, for geography, and caching, a term used to describe hiding hiking or camping provisions. Clear editor. Add to Compare. Determine what your 5th most commonly found Difficulty and Terrain ratings are (individually). The alternative I posted somewhere was to keep a changelog when properties of a cache are updated. Display as a link instead, × A year later a bridge is built over the ravine so the CO changes the T rating to a 2 but want's to keep the 3.5 rating as it indicates the actual terrain rating prior to the bridge being built. Rating: 100%. In this instance, both D3 and T3 are respectively the 5th most commonly found. Allows you to edit the number of geocaches found. Furthermore, let's keep in mind that almost no one will think of this feature until. Conclusion: Both apps restrict basic members, so premium membership is a huge advantage to get the most out of both 14. One is the easiest. Those that are implementing features at GS often don't participate in discussions but they're the only ones that have access to the code. ETA: An extra excessive bonus could be to allow the finder for their find log on a cache to select either the cache stats as of the Log date or the current cache stats - in case the update(s) was to fix a legitimate error. Copyright © 2000-2020 Groundspeak, Inc. DBA Geocaching. You mean like, give the log poster options to choose which data snapshot they'd like to keep with the log? I didn't realize this was where pro database designers criticized helpful suggestions (actually, I realize it wasn't even original; frinklabs asked essentially the same thing in June 2014). There are millions of geocaches worldwide, just waiting for you to find them. Creating a historical view of a cache would reap many other benefits as well. GS added South Sudan as an "official" country right after the change went into effect. Check out [these important guidelines in the subreddit wiki... jump to content. Geocaching hunts range from simple but exciting challenges to complex problem-solving adventures. That to me makes more sense. The cost would be in implementation, as well as providing meaningful API methods to access the information, not so much in storage. The CO corrects the D/T ratings and indicates that they should replace the original values. 4 Reviews. Add to Compare. How to combine those two? To me that seems more straightforward (one or two options, plus other stuff I'm already doing if something like that happens right now). $16.95. Changes to these values would be a job for a reviewer / operator / whoever then. Least impact - let the logger decide whether the properties for their own stats are as of the date they logged it or not. Because the point of the difficulty/terrain ratings is not to preserve your precious D/T grid. I still await a response to this, in the other thread: Here's a question for a forum-active reviewer: Can you see history of changes to a cache listing? Well, then I guess there's no need for this thread then! But I wouldn't store cache data with each and every find log. Celebrating 20 Years of Geocaching Micro Geocoin . her having the initial cache info stored when I begin editing, or giving me the option to store the 'new' correct data would be nice and simple. Ideally, I'd have it set up that the finds do refer to the stats as of the date of the find; in some manner. Select the option based on the most difficult parts of the cache. If this forum is really a black hole, then there's not much point in arguing. To qualify for challenge A5, you will need to use your D/T grid to find a cache with a specific D/T combination.The qualifying cache must be found between Aug 22 - Sep 4. The length of the hike is from the most logical parking area to the cache. Use case 2. Problem: Occasional legit mistakes being corrected may be snapshotted. Later a CO decides their series is no longer 5T because the water level has lowered, and the stats are now skewed to easy walks. I like the idea of posting a log, and in most cases by default having it use the current data; or if Iknow this is a qualifier I can tell it to 'remember' the current cache properties for my stats. You're never going to be able to prevent all disappointments, and I see no pressing need to prevent disappointment to begin with. Project-GC is a site with the goal to provide statistics and tools for all the geocachers in the world. If the only way you can fill the D/T grid and thereby qualify for a challenge cache is to host an event with a spurious D4.5/T3.5 rating the problem is the grid and the challenge - fix those and the incentive to put silly ratings on events disappears.

Das Mittagessen Im Hof Jahr, Stade Innenstadt Parken, Stille Nacht Ein Fest Der Liebe Stream, Badesee Schlitters Zillertal, Sausalitos München Pasing, Bilder Schloss Drachenburg, Uni Wien Noten, Immobilienmakler Für Hartz 4 Empfänger, Heselbacher Hof Familie Schneider,